Why the study?
Does blood pressure variability differ between patients with panic disorder and normal controls?
Does blood pressure variability differ between patients with panic disorder and normal controls?
Patients with panic disorder exhibit increased blood pressure variability and chaos, which may partly explain their increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May partly explain elevated CV mortality risk in panic disorder; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Arterial blood pressure (BP) variability increases progressively with the development of hypertension and an increase in BP variability is associated with end organ damage and cardiovascular morbidity. On the other hand, a decrease in heart rate (HR) variability is associated with significant cardiovascular mortality. There is a strong association between cardiovascular mortality and anxiety. Several previous studies have shown decreased HR variability in patients with anxiety. In this study, we investigated beat-to-beat variability of systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) in normal controls and patients with panic disorder during normal breathing and controlled breathing at 12, and 20 breaths per minute using linear as well as nonlinear techniques. Finger BP signal was obtained noninvasively using Finapres. Standing SBPvi and DBP BPvi (log value of BP variance corrected for mean BP divided by HR variance corrected for mean HR) were significantly higher in patients compared to controls. Largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE) of SBP and DBP, a measure of chaos, was significantly higher in patients in supine as well as standing postures. The ratios of LLE (SBP/HR) and LLE (DBP/HR) were also significantly higher (P<.001) in patients compared to controls. These findings further suggest dissociation between HR and BP variability and a possible relative increase in sympathetic function in anxiety. This increase in BP variability may partly explain the increase in cardiovascular mortality in this group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeragani et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: