Why the study?
Chronic heart failure symptoms and psychosocial factors limit patients' social lives and relationships, impacting health outcomes and highlighting the importance of developing meaningful social networks.
Do interventions targeting the social dimension improve social support in people with chronic heart failure?
Do interventions targeting the social dimension improve social support in people with chronic heart failure?
Interventions targeting the social dimension in chronic heart failure patients may improve social support and self-care, but current evidence is limited and heterogeneous.
Scarcity of RCTs on social interventions in CHF signals unmet need; leaves open effective strategies to improve outcomes.
AIMS: The symptom burden of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), together with social determinants and psychosocial factors, results in limitations to maintain adequate social life and roles, participate in social events and maintain relationships. This situation's impact on health outcomes makes it of utmost importance to develop meaningful social networks for these patients. The primary objective aimed to identify randomized controlled trials that impact the social dimension of people with CHF. The secondary objectives were to analyze the methodological quality of these interventions, establish their components, and synthesize their results. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and CINAHL databases between 2010 and February 2022. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Eight randomized controlled trials were identified, among which two were at 'high risk of bias.' Interventions were synthesized according to the following categories: delivery format, providers and recipients, and the intervention content domains. Half of the studies showed statistical superiority in improving the intervention group's social support in people with CHF. CONCLUSION: This review has highlighted the scarcity of interventions targeting the social dimension of people with CHF. Interventions have been heterogeneous, which limits the statistical combination of studies. Based on narrative review and vote counting, such interventions could potentially improve social support and self-care, which are important patient reported outcomes, thus warrant further research. Future studies should be co-created with patients and families to be adequately targeted. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021256199.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olano‐Lizarraga et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: