Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research in New Zealand on museum visits from two culturally different early years education sites has analysed the ways in which a co-authoring by children/tamariki, teachers/kaiako and artefacts/taonga constructs an understanding of the museum as a ‘forum’ for debate rather than as primarily a ‘temple’ in which the aim is for children to accumulate new understandings and facts. The authors argue that the co-authoring can weave together two processes: an ecological synergy spiral or a going-on, whereby artefacts and things are animated and brought to life; and a storying where heritage stories are restored and improvisation is encouraged. The paper concludes that a co-authoring can construct a museum visit as a forum of inquiry and critique. Key theoretical guidance comes from Mason Durie (a Māori philosopher and educationalist) and Tim Ingold (a Scottish anthropologist who also writes about education).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carr et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: