Why the study?
Does global left ventricular longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) predict cardiovascular events better than LVEF and Sa in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Population
196 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation referred for echocardiographic examination
Comparison
Global left ventricular longitudinal systolic… vs Left ventricular ejection fraction and systolic…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
average 21 ± 10 months
Authors
Loading...
GLS may enhance prognostication in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Does global left ventricular longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) predict cardiovascular events better than LVEF and Sa in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Global longitudinal strain is a stronger predictor of adverse cardiovascular events than LVEF and Sa in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Su et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: