Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background : To evaluate effectiveness of intranasal dexmedetomidine for attenuation of hemo-dynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in adults. Design and setting : This prospective randomized study included 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I, adult patients of either sex, aged between 18-60 years, and undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. Methods : Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups of 30 each, to receive either intranasal saline (Group C), intranasal dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg (Group D 1 ) or intranasal dexmedetomidine 2µg/kg (Group D 2) , administered 30 minutes before the induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia technique was standardized for all patients taking part in the study. Main outcome measures : Primary outcome studied was attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Secondary parameters studied were sedation score and dose of propofol required at induction. Results : There was a statistically significant rise in heart rate and systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures at 1, 3, and 5 minutes of intubation in group C as compared to groups D 1 and D 2 . Sedation score was significantly higher in groups D 1 and D 2 (p<0.0001). Propofol requirement was significantly lower in groups D 1 and D 2 (p<0.0001). Intranasal dexmedetomidine 2µg/kg was associated with higher a incidence of bradycardia. Conclusion : Intranasal dexmedetomidine (1µg/kg and 2µg/kg) effectively diminishes hemodynamic changes associated with laryngoscopy and intubation in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Intranasal dex-medetomidine 2µg/kg is associated with significant bradycardia. Intranasal dexmedetomidine also provides effective preoperative sedation and decreases the dose of propofol required for induction of anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kochhar et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: