Why the study?
Does the use of HUM and EMG filters reduce the R-amplitude in canine electrocardiograms compared to no filters?
Does the use of HUM and EMG filters reduce the R-amplitude in canine electrocardiograms compared to no filters?
Electrocardiographic filters significantly reduce R-amplitude in canine ECGs, with a greater effect in smaller dogs, suggesting the need for size-specific ECG machine characteristics.
Caution advised for filtered canine ECG interpretation, especially in smaller dogs; hypothesis-generating for size-specific veterinary protocols.
Lead II electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded in 88 dogs ranging in weight from 3 to 50 kg. A commercial direct-writing electrocardiograph was used to record the ECGs, first with manual HUM filter (notch filter at 50/60 Hz) and EMG filter (cut-off frequency of -3 dB at 35 Hz) on, immediately followed by a recording with both filters off. The mean (sd) reduction in R-amplitude with the filters on was 53(18) per cent with a range from 22 to 100 per cent and a median value of 51 per cent. The R-amplitude with the filters off was related to the R-amplitude with the filters on, making it possible to correct for the effect of the filters. The reduction in R-amplitude was inversely correlated with the weight of the dog and with the duration of the QRS-complex. Other known changes induced by filters, such as the elimination of notches and the slurring of the junction between the QRS-complex and the ST-interval were also observed. The inverse relationship between the weight of the dog and the magnitude of the reduction in R-amplitude by the filters indicates that ECG machines with different characteristics should ideally be used to record ECGs in dogs of different sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dvir et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: