This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The electrochemical stability window (ESW) defines the voltage range within which an electrolyte remains stable against oxidation and reduction, serving as a key descriptor for ionic liquid (IL)-based systems. The ESWs of 15 ILs with diverse cation-anion combinations were systematically investigated, both in their neat forms and as binary mixtures with three representative solvents, i.e., propylene carbonate (PC), ethylene glycol (EG), and tetrahydrofuran (THF). Cyclic voltammetry on a glassy carbon electrode determined anodic and cathodic stability limits, revealing that ESW protection in IL-solvent mixtures strongly depends on solvent polarity, proticity, and IL compatibility. PC, with a high dielectric constant and aprotic character, broadened anodic limits and moderately stabilized cathodic limits. THF maintained compact interfacial structure, offering additional cathodic protection, whereas EG, being protic, reduced ESWs via proton-coupled electron transfer and hydrogen evolution. The solvent protection trend followed by PC > THF > EG, with bulky, hydrophobic cations ([HMIM] + , [BMPYRR] + ) and weakly coordinating anions ([NTF 2 ] - , [DCA] - , [DEP] - ) showing the highest ESW protection for 50 mol% IL in these solvents. Among the neat ILs, [EMIM][DEP], [HMIM][PF 6 ], and [BMPYRR][DCA] showed wide ESWs of ∼5.5 V. These results provide valuable insight into solvent-modulated electrochemical stability, enabling rational design of IL-based electrolytes for energy storage and electrosynthesis. • Anodic and cathodic limits of ILs were evaluated using a ±1 mA cm −2 cutoff. • Effects of solvent polarity, proticity, and IL-solvent compatibility were analyzed. • PC and THF stabilize ESWs, while EG narrows ESWs via proton-coupled reduction. • A solvent protection trend of PC > THF > EG was established for IL electrolytes. • Design principles for stable high-voltage IL-solvent electrolytes are proposed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chauhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: