Why the study?
Does non-invasive Doppler ultrasound accurately measure end-diastolic pressure gradient and mitral valve area compared to invasive manometric recordings in adult patients with mitral stenosis?
Does non-invasive Doppler ultrasound accurately measure end-diastolic pressure gradient and mitral valve area compared to invasive manometric recordings in adult patients with mitral stenosis?
Non-invasive Doppler ultrasound is an accurate and diagnostically valuable tool for assessing end-diastolic pressure gradient and mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis.
Supports non-invasive Doppler for mitral stenosis assessment; extends correlative evidence but leaves open need for prospective validation.
The pressure gradient across the mitral valve in mitral stenosis was determined by measurement of the maximum recorded velocity of the mitral jet at end-diastole using non-invasive Doppler ultrasound. The accuracy of the Doppler ultrasound technique was evaluated in 25 adult patients with mitral stenosis. In 10 patients, simultaneous ultrasound recordings and manometric recordings were made during cardiac catheterization. In seventeen patients with pure mitral stenosis, the mitral valve area was calculated from the manometric data using the Gorlin formula and from the ultrasound data. Good correlation was found between the Doppler ultrasound and the manometric method for the determination of both the end-diastolic pressure gradient and the mitral valve area. Results confirm that the non-invasive Doppler ultrasound technique is of diagnostic value in the assessment of mitral stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robson et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: