Why the study?
Does echocardiography provide an accurate and cost-effective alternative to cardiac catheterization in evaluating cardiovascular disease?
Does echocardiography provide an accurate and cost-effective alternative to cardiac catheterization in evaluating cardiovascular disease?
Echocardiography provides an accurate and cost-effective alternative to cardiac catheterization for evaluating many cardiovascular conditions, though future research must demonstrate its impact on patient outcomes.
May support echo-guided decisions in valve disease; leaves open outcome trials before replacing catheterization.
Definitive evaluation of cardiovascular disease is traditionally accomplished by cardiac catheterization. Advances in transthoracic and transesophageal Doppler echocardiography provides an accurate and cost-effective approach when compared to cardiac catheterization. Recent data suggests that for most adult patients with aortic or mitral valve disease, Doppler echocardiographic data enables the clinician to make the same decision reached with catheterization data. Echo and Doppler studies are useful in guiding certain therapeutic interventional procedures, and in the diagnosis of aortic dissection, mechanical complications of myocardial infarction, and in identifying aortic atheromas as a potential source of embolism. Future research will need to demonstrate that not only is echocardiography cost-effective, but that it will change the outcome of the patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Missri (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: