Why the study?
How does postmortem measurement of mitral valve area compare to estimation by cardiac catheterization?
How does postmortem measurement of mitral valve area compare to estimation by cardiac catheterization?
Postmortem measurement of mitral valve area was found to be significantly larger (75-213%) than estimates derived from cardiac catheterization.
Cath MVA may underestimate true orifice area; single case leaves measurement accuracy open for validation.
A rare opportunity to measure mitral valve area at autopsy shortly after its estimation by means of cardiac catheterization was afforded without the complicating influences of surgery, subacute bacterial endocarditis, smouldering rheumatic valvulitis, or a long enough time interval between catheterization and postmortem study for increased stenosis or increased cardiomegaly to occur. The postmortem estimation of mitral valve area varied between 75 and 213 per cent greater than the mitral valve area estimated from cardiac catheterization data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H. Richter (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: