Why the study?
Detecting reliable heartbeat signals using channel state information has been difficult due to the influence of clutter, DC components, and respiratory harmonics.
Does non-contact measurement using software defined radios accurately measure cardiopulmonary activity compared to traditional contact medical sensors?
Does non-contact measurement using software defined radios accurately measure cardiopulmonary activity compared to traditional contact medical sensors?
A novel software-defined radio system provides accurate, non-contact measurement of heart rate and respiratory signals, offering a potential alternative to traditional contact sensors.
Non-contact CSI vital sign extraction is feasible in humans; leaves open clinical translation pending validation trials.
Vital signs are important indicators to evaluate the health status of patients. Channel state information (CSI) can sense the displacement of the chest wall caused by cardiorespiratory activity in a non-contact manner. Due to the influence of clutter, DC components, and respiratory harmonics, it is difficult to detect reliable heartbeat signals. To address this problem, this paper proposes a robust and novel method for simultaneously extracting breath and heartbeat signals using software defined radios (SDR). Specifically, we model and analyze the signal and propose singular value decomposition (SVD)-based clutter suppression method to enhance the vital sign signals. The DC is estimated and compensated by the circle fitting method. Then, the heartbeat signal and respiratory signal are obtained by the modified variational modal decomposition (VMD). The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can accurately separate the respiratory signal and the heartbeat signal from the filtered signal. The Bland-Altman analysis shows that the proposed system is in good agreement with the medical sensors. In addition, the proposed system can accurately measure the heart rate variability (HRV) within 0.5m. In summary, our system can be used as a preferred contactless alternative to traditional contact medical sensors, which can provide advanced patient-centered healthcare solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: