Why the study?
Weak heartbeat signals are easily overwhelmed by respiratory harmonics and noise during noncontact radar detection, making accurate heart rate estimation challenging.
Does FMCW radar with a novel decomposition method accurately estimate respiratory and heart rates compared to ECG?
Does FMCW radar with a novel decomposition method accurately estimate respiratory and heart rates compared to ECG?
A novel FMCW radar-based signal processing method can estimate respiratory and heart rates with high accuracy compared to standard ECG.
Supports contactless vital sign tech development; leaves open clinical validation before any practice consideration.
Vital signs, such as respiratory rate (RR) and heart rate (HR), are essential indicators for assessing human health. Radar enables noncontact detection of RR and HR. However, chest displacement caused by heartbeats is much smaller than that caused by respiration. And the weak heartbeat signal is susceptible to being overwhelmed by respiratory harmonics and noise, making HR detection challenging. To address these issues, we propose a novel vital sign decomposition method. Phase difference and Hampel filter are used to suppress unknown noise, and discrete wavelet transform (DWT) is used to separate respiratory signal. To achieve more accurate estimation of heartbeat signal frequency, we introduce the singular value decomposition (SVD)-focal underdetermined system solver (FOCUSS)-recovery (SFR) method following successive variational mode decomposition (SVMD). This method possesses feature extraction and sparsity optimization capabilities, thereby improving spectral resolution and the estimation of heartbeat signal frequency. Experimental results demonstrate that the root mean square error (RMSE) between ECG sensor measurements and proposed method is below 1 beat per minute (bpm) for RR and below 2 bpm for HR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: