An extension of McGuire's inoculation theory, from the area of cultural truisms to the realm of controverted beliefs, was investigated by manipulating previous attack as part of a group discussion situation in which actual defense of an issue was considered essential for having an inoculating effect. Results (p < 0.05) favored the main hypothesis when group I (requiring defense in response to a written verbal attack) was compared with the control group, but there were no significant differences between group I and group 2 (requiring discussion but no defense since there was no verbal attack).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quereshi et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: