Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We define belief-free equilibria in two-player games with incomplete information as sequential equilibria for which players' continuation strategies are best replies after every history, independently of their beliefs about the state of nature. We characterize a set of payoffs that includes all belief-free equilibrium payoffs. Conversely, any payoff in the interior of this set is a belief-free equilibrium payoff. The characterization is applied to the analysis of reputations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hörner et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: