Why the study?
Left ventricular remodeling after STEMI is frequent and severe, prompting a metabolomic approach to reveal unknown biomarkers associated with it.
Does metabolomic profiling identify novel biomarkers associated with left ventricular remodeling in patients with successfully revascularized STEMI?
Does metabolomic profiling identify novel biomarkers associated with left ventricular remodeling in patients with successfully revascularized STEMI?
Metabolomic profiling did not identify novel biomarkers for post-STEMI left ventricular remodeling, whereas traditional markers of infarct size and inflammation remained predictive.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metabolomic profiling may identify novel post-STEMI LVR biomarkers; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before clinical adoption.
Left ventricular remodeling (LVR) occurring after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is frequent and severe. We present a metabolomic approach as an attempt to reveal unknown biomarkers associated with post-STEMI LVR. Out of 192 consecutive patients with successfully revascularized STEMI, 32 presented LVR and were clinically matched with 32 no-LVR patients. They underwent cardiac magnetic resonance at baseline, three months and 12 months. Blood samples were collected during index hospitalization. Creatine kinase (CK) peak and inflammatory markers were higher for LVR patients compared to no-LVR patients (mean 3466 ± 2211 and 2394 ± 1615 UI/L respectively, p = 0.005 for CK peak; mean 35.9 ± 44.3 vs. 21.7 ± 30.4 mg/L respectively, p = 0.020 for C-reactive protein). Leukocyte and neutrophil counts were also higher for LVR patients (mean 12028 ± 2593/mL vs. 10346 ± 3626/mL respectively, p = 0.028 and mean 9035 ± 3036/mL vs. 7596 ± 3822/mL respectively, p < 0.001). For metabolomic analysis, sphingomyelin C20:2 and symmetrical dimethylarginine were higher for LVR patients, but did not reach significance after the correction for the alpha risk. The metabolomic approach did not discriminate patients with and without LVR. However, common parameters that focus on infarction severity, such as infarct size and inflammatory markers, differed between the groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcia et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: