Key result
Unprovoked PE shows a similar long-term adverse event risk compared to provoked PE.
Why the study?
Information on the long-term prognosis and risk for adverse events in patients with acute pulmonary embolism was lacking.
Does unprovoked acute pulmonary embolism increase the long-term risk of composite adverse clinical events compared with provoked pulmonary embolism or no pulmonary embolism?
Cohort (n=1,200)
Does unprovoked acute pulmonary embolism increase the long-term risk of composite adverse clinical events compared with provoked pulmonary embolism or no pulmonary embolism?
Acute pulmonary embolism carries a high long-term burden of morbidity and mortality, with more than half of both provoked and unprovoked PE patients experiencing a serious adverse clinical event within 4 years compared with 16% of controls.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports tailored long-term surveillance by PE trigger; leaves open whether unprovoked cases warrant dedicated RCTs for extended therapy.
Rationale There is a lack of information on the long-term prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Objectives To assess the long-term risk for adverse events after PE. Methods Consecutive patients diagnosed with PE between January 2001 and July 2007, and patients in whom PE was ruled out from a previous study were followed until July 2008 for the occurrence of adverse clinical events: mortality, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism, cancer, arterial cardiovascular events and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Hazard ratios (HR) for all endpoints and a combined endpoint were calculated and adjusted for potential confounders. Measurements and Main Results Three hundred eight patients with unprovoked, 558 with provoked, and 334 without PE were studied with a median follow-up period of 3.3 years. Patients with unprovoked PE had a lower overall risk for mortality than patients with provoked PE (HR, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.82), but a higher risk for nonmalignancy-related mortality (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3–2.5), recurrent venous thromboembolism (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3–3.1), cancer (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.0–10), cardiovascular events (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5–3.8) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (1.5 vs. 0%). The risk for the combined endpoint did not differ between both groups (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82–1.1). Patients without PE had similar risks for malignancy and cardiovascular events than patients with provoked PE, but lower risks for the remaining outcomes. The fraction of both patients with provoked and unprovoked PE without events after 1 year was only 70% and decreased to fewer than 60% after 2 years and fewer than 50% after 4 years, whereas this latter was 84% for the control patients. Conclusions The clinical course of acute PE is complicated by high rates of serious adverse events, which occur in half of the patients within 4 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klok et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=1,200). Unprovoked acute pulmonary embolism vs. Provoked acute pulmonary embolism and controls without pulmonary embolism was evaluated on Combined endpoint of mortality, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism, cancer, arterial cardiovascular events, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82-1.1). Unprovoked PE had a similar risk of combined adverse events vs provoked PE (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.82-1.1), with >50% of PE patients having an event within 4 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: