Why the study?
Adrenergic stimulation elicits lower increments in LV long-axis motion and LA-LV pressure gradients in HFpEF than in healthy subjects, leading to the hypothesis that exercise in HFpEF further impairs passive LV filling during conduit flow.
Does left atrial conduit flow rate during exercise differ between patients with HFpEF and asymptomatic controls?
Does left atrial conduit flow rate during exercise differ between patients with HFpEF and asymptomatic controls?
3D-echocardiography reveals that left atrial conduit flow rate decreases during exercise in HFpEF patients compared to an increase in healthy controls, serving as a potential marker of impaired LV relaxation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exercise may impair early diastolic filling in HFpEF; leaves open whether conduit flow guides therapy or predicts outcomes.
AIMS: In healthy subjects, adrenergic stimulation augments left ventricular (LV) long-axis shortening and lengthening, and increases left atrial (LA) to LV intracavitary pressure gradients in early diastole. Lower increments are observed in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We hypothesized that exercise in HFpEF would further impair passive LV filling in early-mid diastole, during conduit flow from pulmonary veins. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty HFpEF patients (67.8 ± 9.8 years; 11 women), diagnosed using 2007 ESC recommendations, underwent ramped semi-supine bicycle exercise to submaximal target heart rate (∼100 bpm) or symptoms. Seventeen asymptomatic subjects (64.3 ± 8.9 years; 7 women) were controls. Simultaneous LA and LV volumes were measured from pyramidal 3D-echocardiographic full-volume datasets acquired from an apical window at baseline and during stress, together with brachial arterial pressure. LA conduit flow was computed from the increase in LV volume from its minimum at end-systole to the last frame before atrial contraction (onset of the P wave), minus the reduction in LA volume during the same time interval; the difference was integrated and expressed as average flow rate, according to a published formula. The slope of single-beat preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) quantified LV inotropic state. 3D LV torsion (rotation of the apex minus rotation of the base divided by LV length) was also measurable, both at rest and during stress, in 10 HFpEF patients and 4 controls. There were divergent responses in conduit flow rate, which increased by 40% during exercise in controls (+17.8 ± 37.3 mL/s) but decreased by 18% in patients with HFpEF (-9.6 ± 42.3 mL/s) (P = 0.046), along with congruent changes (+1.77 ± 1.13°/cm vs. -1.94 ± 2.73°/cm) in apical torsion (P = 0.032). Increments of conduit flow rate and apical torsion during stress correlated with changes in PRSW slope (P = 0.003 and P = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In HFpEF, conduit flow rate decreases when diastolic dysfunction develops during exercise, in parallel with changes in LV inotropic state and torsion, contributing to impaired stroke volume reserve. Conduit flow is measurable using 3D-echocardiographic full-volume atrio-ventricular datasets, and as a marker of LV relaxation can contribute to the diagnosis of HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marino et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: