Why the study?
Postoperative atrial fibrillation carries considerable prognostic consequences after surgery, including lung cancer resection, warranting review of its prediction, prevention, and management.
Postoperative atrial fibrillation after lung cancer surgery carries significant prognostic consequences, including increased long-term stroke and mortality risk, and should be managed similarly to spontaneous atrial fibrillation.
POAF signals long-term risks after lung cancer surgery; leaves open validated prediction strategies for routine use.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of the early postoperative period of various types of surgery, including that for lung cancer. Although induced by the homeostatic alterations related to surgery, there is evidence that it is not a mere stand-alone transitory event, but it represents a relevant complication of surgery, bearing considerable prognostic consequences. Different methods have therefore been explored to predict the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and prevent it. In particular, the age among clinical factors, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), as a marker, have proven to be good predictors, and the use of beta-blockers or amiodarone in primary prevention seems to reduce its incidence significantly. There is growing evidence that POAF significantly increases the risk of stroke and global mortality in the long term; therefore, it should be managed in the same way as spontaneous atrial fibrillation. In this review, we will present the strongest evidence found so far and the most recent findings regarding the management of POAF, with a special focus on patients undergoing thoracic surgery for lung cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Semeraro et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: