Why the study?
Can a supervised machine learning approach accurately classify myocardial strain curves as reliable or artefactual?
Can a supervised machine learning approach accurately classify myocardial strain curves as reliable or artefactual?
A supervised machine learning tool can accurately classify myocardial strain curves as physiological or artefactual, potentially enhancing the reliability of clinical strain estimations.
May improve reliability of strain markers before clinical use; leaves open external validation in prospective cohorts.
Quantitative assessment of global and regional left ventricle function by means of myocardial strain estimation has been widely discussed as promising clinical diagnostic markers of left ventricular malfunction. These markers are provided to the clinicians without much feedback regarding their reliability, which may lead to erroneous diagnosis. Therefore, this study aims to classify the calculated strain curves into reliable or artefactual ones, before their clinical adaptation.A supervised machine learning approach is utilized for the classification process. A total of 6,552 strain curves were used, for which a visual labeling protocol was defined and utilized by two experts.An inter-observer labeling concordance of 93% was obtained, and a classification accuracy of 90% was achieved with a specificity of 92% and sensitivity of 78%.This classification tool may enhance the reliability of the estimations of global, transmural and regional strain curves, by automatically classifying them into physiological or artefactual curves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khamis et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: