Key result
A strain curve pattern (cluster 9) identified by unsupervised machine learning was associated with increased risk of incident heart failure compared to cluster 3 (HR 8.95; 95% CI 2.08-38.48; P=0.003).
Why the study?
The entire echocardiographic longitudinal strain curve may contain prognostic information for heart failure risk beyond the peak global longitudinal strain value.
Does unsupervised machine learning analysis of the entire longitudinal strain curve predict incident heart failure independently of global longitudinal strain in a general population?
Cohort (n=3,710)
Does unsupervised machine learning analysis of the entire longitudinal strain curve predict incident heart failure independently of global longitudinal strain in a general population?
Hazard Ratio: 8.95 (95% CI 2.08–38.48)
p-value: p=0.003
Unsupervised machine learning analysis of echocardiographic longitudinal strain curves identifies novel deformation patterns that predict incident heart failure independently of peak global longitudinal strain.
BACKGROUND: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is recognized as a powerful predictor of heart failure (HF). However, the entire strain curve may entail important prognostic information regarding HF risk that might be undiscovered by only focusing on the peak strain value. OBJECTIVE: The hypothesis of the present study was, that analysis of the entire strain curve using unsupervised machine learning (uML) would reveal novel ventricular deformation patterns capable of predicting incident HF independently of GLS. METHODS: Longitudinal strain curves from 3710 subjects from the general population without prevalent HF were analyzed using uML. RESULTS: Mean age was 56 years and 43 % were male. During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 92 subjects (2.5 %) developed HF. The uML algorithm generated a hierarchical clustering tree (HCT) resulting in 10 different clusters. Generally, the strain curves displayed reduced early diastolic strain to peak-strain ratio with an increasing incidence rate of HF. In multivariable Cox regressions, cluster 9 was significantly associated with increased risk of HF when compared to cluster 2-5, and 7-8 [For cluster 3: HR 8.95, 95 %CI: 2.08;38.48, P = 0.003] even though the subjects of cluster 9 were younger, displayed healthier clinical baseline characteristics, and only had slightly reduced GLS. The mean strain curve of cluster 9 displayed an early systolic lengthening followed by a late and reduced contraction specifically related to the basal lateral segment. CONCLUSION: The unsupervised machine learning algorithm identified unknown strain patterns beyond GLS presumably related to increased risk of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simonsen et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=3,710). Cluster 9 strain curve pattern vs. Cluster 3 was evaluated on Incident heart failure (HR 8.95, 95% CI 2.08-38.48, p=0.003). A strain curve pattern (cluster 9) identified by unsupervised machine learning was associated with increased risk of incident heart failure compared to cluster 3 (HR 8.95; 95% CI 2.08-38.48; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: