Why the study?
Evaluating fetal cardiac repolarization via nfECG is safe and affordable but challenging due to low T-wave amplitudes and high noise, while alternative modalities are invasive or less accessible.
Does a novel model-based method accurately estimate QT and QTc intervals in non-invasive fetal ECG signals compared to reference methods?
Does a novel model-based method accurately estimate QT and QTc intervals in non-invasive fetal ECG signals compared to reference methods?
A novel model-based method for non-invasive fetal ECG can accurately estimate QT and QTc intervals with less than 5% difference compared to invasive reference methods.
May aid non-invasive fetal repolarization monitoring; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
The end timing of T waves in fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) is important for the evaluation of ST and QT intervals which are vital markers to assess cardiac repolarization patterns. Monitoring malignant fetal arrhythmias in utero is fundamental to care in congenital heart anomalies preventing perinatal death. Currently, reliable detection of end of T waves is possible only by using fetal scalp ECG (fsECG) and fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG). fMCG is expensive and less accessible and fsECG is an invasive technique available only during intrapartum period. Another safer and affordable alternative is the non-invasive fECG (nfECG) which can provide similar assessment provided by fsECG and fMECG but with less accuracy (not beat by beat). Detection of T waves using nfECG is challenging because of their low amplitudes and high noise. In this study, a novel model-based method that estimates the end of T waves in nfECG signals is proposed. The repolarization phase has been modeled as the discharging phase of a capacitor. To test the model, fECG signals were collected from 58 pregnant women (age: (34 ± 6) years old) bearing normal and abnormal fetuses with gestational age (GA) 20-41 weeks. QT and QTc intervals have been calculated to test the level of agreement between the model-based and reference values (fsECG and Doppler Ultrasound (DUS) signals) in normal subjects. The results of the test showed high agreement between model-based and reference values (difference < 5%), which implies that the proposed model could be an alternative method to detect the end of T waves in nfECG signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Widatalla et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: