Why the study?
How do various non-invasive methods compare to cardiac catheterization in diagnosing right ventricular overload in patients with various heart and lung diseases?
How do various non-invasive methods compare to cardiac catheterization in diagnosing right ventricular overload in patients with various heart and lung diseases?
Combining multiple non-invasive imaging and clinical modalities provides accurate assessment of right ventricular overload compared to invasive cardiac catheterization.
May support non-invasive RV overload assessment; leaves open prospective validation versus catheterization.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeshi THUGU (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: