Key result
Noninvasive Doppler echo shows ~0.84 correlation with invasive RHC for estimating sPAP and LVFP.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of various noninvasive echocardiographic techniques for estimating main hemodynamic parameters in clinical practice.
Does noninvasive hemodynamic assessment with Doppler echocardiography reliably estimate invasive measures from right heart catheterization in patients with an indication for RHC?
Observational (n=84)
Does noninvasive hemodynamic assessment with Doppler echocardiography reliably estimate invasive measures from right heart catheterization in patients with an indication for RHC?
Noninvasive echocardiographic methods, particularly multiparametric approaches for left ventricular filling pressures, can reliably estimate several hemodynamic parameters compared to invasive right heart catheterization.
AIMS: The study aimed at evaluating the reliability and reproducibility of various noninvasive echocardiographic techniques for the estimation of the main hemodynamic parameters in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 84 patients with a generic indication of right heart catheterization (RHC) executed a transthoracic echocardiography shortly before or after the RHC. All the parameters necessary for a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation of right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance and cardiac output were acquired and the agreement with the invasive measures was evaluated by a Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Noninvasive evaluation of right atrial pressure showed a moderate and low correlation with RHC using inferior vena cava parameters (r = 0.517) and tricuspid E/E' ratio (sensitivity 0.23, specificity 0.72), respectively. PAPs estimation from the tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity had a good correlation (r = 0.836) and feasibility (82.1%), as well as PAPm from tricuspid regurgitation mean gradient (r = 0.78, applicability 72.6%) and from pulmonary acceleration time (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.5, applicability 92.9%). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure multiparametric evaluation, as suggested by the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations, showed a good correlation (sensitivity 0.96, specificity 0.59). The noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary vascular resistance and cardiac output did not prove to be clinically accurate. CONCLUSION: Various hemodynamic parameters can be adequately estimated with noninvasive methods. In particular, a multiparametric approach for the evaluation of left ventricle filling pressures is advisable and the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations are reliable even in a heterogeneous population with a significant quota of precapillary pulmonary hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scordilli et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Indication for right heart catheterization (n=84). Doppler echocardiography vs. Right heart catheterization was evaluated on Agreement between noninvasive echocardiographic techniques and invasive measures for hemodynamic parameters. Noninvasive Doppler echocardiography showed good correlation with invasive right heart catheterization for estimating systolic pulmonary artery pressure (r=0.836) and left ventricle filling pressures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: