Leaf hygrometer v. pressure chamber: a comparison of pressure–volume curve data obtained on single leaves by alternating measurements

Data for the construction of pressure‐volume curves were obtained by measuring water potentials of detached leaves repeatedly and alternately, with a pressure chamber and a leaf hygrometer. Good agreement between the parameters of the two resulting curves was observed. Regression lines on values after the loss of turgor were always more negative for the thermocouple data, with a maximum difference for the osmotic potential at full saturation of 0.25 MPa in Triticum and a minimum of 0.01 MPa in Populus. Neither the slopes of the regression lines nor the intercepts with the axes were statistically different. We see no reason for using one of these two unrelated methods as a standard against which the other is calibrated. Implications for the theory of pressure‐volume curves are discussed.