Why the study?
Is the ACE I/D polymorphism associated with an increased risk of knee osteoarthritis?
Is the ACE I/D polymorphism associated with an increased risk of knee osteoarthritis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ACE I/D polymorphism does not appear to be significantly associated with susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis, though high heterogeneity exists among studies.
BACKGROUND: Studies of angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphisms and the risks of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have yielded conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between ACE I/D and knee OA, we conducted a combined case-control study and meta-analysis. METHODS: For the case-control study, 447 knee OA cases and 423 healthy controls were recruited between March 2010 and July 2011. Knee OA cases were defined using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system, and the ACE I/D genotype was determined using a standard polymerase chain reaction. The association between ACE I/D and knee OA was detected using allele, genotype, dominant, and recessive models. For the meta-analysis, PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for prospective observational studies published up until August 2015. Studies of ACE I/D and knee OA with sufficient data were selected. Pooled results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the D versus I allele with regard to knee OA risk. RESULTS: We found no significant association between the D allele and knee OA [OR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.76-1.89)] in the present case-control study, and the results of other genetic models were also nonsignificant. Five current studies were included, and there were a total of six study populations after including our case-control study (1165 cases and 1029 controls). In the meta-analysis, the allele model also yielded nonsignificant results [OR: 1.37 (95% CI: 0.95-1.99)] and a high heterogeneity (I2: 87.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The association between ACE I/D and knee OA tended to yield negative results. High heterogeneity suggests a complex, multifactorial mechanism, and an epistasis analysis of ACE I/D and knee OA should therefore be conducted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: