Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To examine the effect of supplying methionine and lysine on milk N composition, isoenergetic, isonitrogenous diets containing 50:50 with 3.9% added fat or 25:75 forage to concentrate with no added fat were fed with or without rumen-protected methionine and lysine to four primiparous and four multiparous early lactation (36 d in milk) Holstein cows in two 4 x 4 Latin squares. Diets contained 1.7 Mcal NE1 and were fed for ad libitum intake. Periods were 21 d. Rumen-protected methionine and lysine increased total N and casein N percentage with the 3.9% fat, but did not increase total N and casein N percentage with the diet without fat. Whey N percentage was greater with the no fat than with the 3.9% fat diet. Whey N percentage was not affected by adding amino acids. Nonprotein N percentage was greater for the diet with the 3.9% fat than with no fat. Proportions of casein N or whey N to total N were unaffected by treatments. Adding methionine and lysine to diets did not increase yields of total N and casein N. The 3.9% fat diet increased proportions of long-chain (C18:0 and C18:1) and decreased proportions of short- to medium-chain fatty acids (C8 to C16) in milk fat. Plasma nonesterified fatty acids and triglyceride concentrations were greater with the 3.9% fat as compared to the no fat diet. Methionine and lysine decreased plasma triglyceride concentrations with the 3.9% fat diet. Milk yields, DM intakes, and plasma glucose concentrations were unaffected by treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: