Why the study?
This review was conducted to overview three topic areas observed to be highly active in the cardiac rehabilitation research literature published in 2019 and 2020.
This review highlights recent trends in cardiac rehabilitation research, emphasizing the importance of enrollment, mental health, and expanding indications beyond traditional coronary interventions.
Highlights enrollment, mental health, and nontraditional diagnoses as active CR research areas; leaves open evidence-based implementation strategies.
This review overviews three topic areas observed to be highly active in the cardiac rehabilitation (CR) research literature published in 2019 and 2020. Topics summarized were enrollment or adherence in CR programs; mental health, particularly depression, stress, and anxiety of patients participating in CR programs; and patients participating in CR programs with diagnoses other than coronary artery bypass graft, myocardial infarction, or percutaneous coronary interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozemek et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: