Why the study?
Does exercise transcutaneous oximetry accurately detect >75% stenosis in hypogastric circulation arteries compared to CTA in patients referred for testing?
Does exercise transcutaneous oximetry accurately detect >75% stenosis in hypogastric circulation arteries compared to CTA in patients referred for testing?
Exercise transcutaneous oximetry demonstrates satisfactory diagnostic performance for detecting >75% arterial stenoses in the hypogastric circulation when externally validated against CTA.
May support Ex-tcPO2 for buttock claudication evaluation; leaves open need for prospective outcome validation.
BACKGROUND: Exercise transcutaneous oximetry (Ex-tcPO2) is a non-invasive test for exercise-induced buttock ischemia. Prior study defined Ex-tcPO2 normal/abnormal cut-offs against arteriography but no external validation was available. The aims of this study were therefore to (1) determine the diagnostic performance of Ex-tcPO2 against CTA; (2) determine the cut-off point for detection of stenosis >75% in arteries toward the hypogastric circulation; and (3) determine the effect of chest profile classification on the diagnostic performance of Ex-tcPO2. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 207 patients referred for Ex-tcPO2 were analyzed. DROP during Ex-tcPO2 was compared with the CTA results. Chest-tcPO2 changes were automatically classified into pre-defined profiles representing normal or abnormal responses. Using DROP <-15 mmHg as a cut-off, Ex-tcPO2 had 80.2% sensitivity, 72.3% specificity, 43.1% PPV, 93.3% NPV and 73.9% accuracy, to detect 1 stenosis >75% in arteries toward the hypogastric circulation. Optimal DROP to detect stenosis was: -15 mmHg. The overall diagnostic performance of Ex-tcPO2 was independent of chest profile classification. CONCLUSIONS: Ex-tcPO2 has satisfactory diagnostic performance to detect arterial stenoses towards the hypogastric circulation. Abnormal chest-tcPO2 profile does not impair the overall diagnostic performance of the test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Audonnet et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: