Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the function of vascular biomarkers in predicting the need for hemodialysis in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Do vascular biomarkers (VCAM-1, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2) predict the need for hemodialysis in critically ill COVID-19 patients?
Do vascular biomarkers (VCAM-1, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2) predict the need for hemodialysis in critically ill COVID-19 patients?
Vascular biomarkers, specifically VCAM-1 and the Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio measured at ICU admission, are significant predictors for the need for hemodialysis and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
May support endothelial marker research in COVID-19; leaves open clinical utility for hemodialysis prediction pending validation.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this was to evaluate the function of vascular biomarkers to predict the need for hemodialysis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a prospective study with 58 critically ill patients due to COVID-19 infection. Laboratory tests in general and vascular biomarkers, such as VCAM-1, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2, were quantified on intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: There was a 40% death rate. VCAM and Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio on ICU admission were associated with the need for hemodialysis. Vascular biomarkers (VCAM-1, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-2/angiopoietin-1 ratio) were predictors of death and their cutoff values were useful to stratify patients with a worse prognosis. In the multivariate cox regression analysis with adjusted models, VCAM-1 (OR 1.13 [CI 95%: 1.01-1.27]; p = 0.034) and Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio (OR 4.87 [CI 95%: 1.732-13.719]; p = 0.003) were associated with the need for dialysis. CONCLUSION: Vascular biomarkers, mostly VCAM-1 and Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio, showed better efficiency to predict the need for hemodialysis in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaranza et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: