Why the study?
How normal blood pressure is achieved despite sympathoexcitation in healthy pregnancy, and the mechanisms driving sympathetic activation in hypertensive pregnancy disorders, remain unclear.
This review summarizes the physiological and pathological roles of the sympathetic nervous system and neurovascular adaptations in normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies.
Highlights neurovascular adaptations potentially offsetting sympathoexcitation in normotensive pregnancy; leaves open understudied pathways in hypertensive states.
NEW FINDINGS: What is the topic of this review? Sympathoexcitation in both healthy and hypertensive pregnancies, and concurrent adaptations along the neurovascular cascade. What advances does it highlight? Known and plausible adaptations along the neurovascular cascade which may offset elevated MSNA in normotensive pregnancy while also highlighting knowledge gaps regarding understudied pathways. ABSTRACT: The progression from conception through to the postpartum period represents an extraordinary period of physiological adaptation in the mother to support the growth and development of the fetus. Healthy, normotensive human pregnancies are associated with striking increases in both plasma volume and sympathetic nerve activity, yet normal or reduced blood pressure; it represents a unique period of apparent healthy sympathetic hyperactivity. However, how this normal blood pressure is achieved in the face of sympathoexcitation, and the mechanisms responsible for this increased activity are unclear. Importantly, sympathetic activation has been implicated in hypertensive pregnancy disorders - the leading causes of maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality in the developed world. An understudied link between pregnancy and the development of maternal hypertension may lie in the sympathetic nervous system regulation of blood pressure. This brief review presents the latest data on sympathoexcitation in both healthy and hypertensive pregnancies, and concurrent adaptations along the neurovascular cascade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brislane et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: