The main objective of this on-site study is to use a full-scale Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) system installed in an office building in Taiwan for comparing the power consumption, energy-saving, and carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction of two different strategies for controlling the HVAC. These strategies are the Constant Volume (CV) system [Constant Air Volume+Constant-flow], and the Variable Volume (VV) system [Variable Air Volume +Variable-flow]. The on-site experimental results indicate that average power consumptions are 164 kW for the CV system, and 88 kW for the VV system; the average electric current drops from 469 A for the CV system to 258 A for the VV system. Approximately 46% of the average energy-saving can be achieved if the HVAC system is operated as a VV system. Additionally, the reduced quantity of accumulated CO2 emission varies from 67 to 3687 kg with 0.637 kg CO2 kwh−1 emission factor during the office hours of 08:30 (a.m.)–17:00 (p.m.). The results demonstrate that switching the operation of an office building HVAC system from CV to VV will significantly enhance energy-savings and CO2 reduction. This studywill offer useful information for evaluating an indoor environmental policy with respect to energy-savings and CO2 emission reduction for office HVACs used in subtropical regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: