This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background/Objectives: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative ESKAPE pathogens, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii, pose a significant global health threat. Gramicidin S, a potent cyclic antimicrobial peptide, is largely ineffective against these bacteria, and its high haemolytic toxicity limits its clinical usage. This study reports on several novel gramicidin S analogues with improved efficacy and safety profiles against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Methods: A total of 19 gramicidin S derivatives were synthesised using Fmoc-based solid-phase peptide synthesis with targeted substitutions to enhance cationicity and modulate hydrophobicity. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined against standard Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains. Haemolytic toxicity and in vitro nephrotoxicity were evaluated using human red blood cells and HEK-293 cells, respectively. All peptides were characterised by RP-HPLC and HRMS. Results: The selective incorporation of DArg and Trp significantly enhanced activity against Gram-negative bacteria while reducing cytotoxicity. Peptide 8 improved the therapeutic index (TI) against E. coli by 10-fold (MIC: 8 µg/mL; TI: 4.10) compared to gramicidin S (MIC: 32 µg/mL; TI: 0.38). Peptide 9 exhibited an 8-fold potency increase against K. pneumoniae and a 25-fold TI improvement. Peptide 19 enhanced activity against P. aeruginosa 8-fold over gramicidin S, while peptide 7 showed a 27-fold TI enhancement. All active peptides retained broad-spectrum activity against S. aureus, including MRSA. Conclusions: The findings highlight the critical role of balancing hydrophobicity and cationicity to overcome species-specific resistance mechanisms. Our gramicidin S analogues demonstrate potent broad-spectrum activity with significantly reduced toxicity compared to the parent peptide, providing a robust platform for the development of new antibiotics against ESKAPE bacterial pathogens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalyvas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: