Why the study?
What are the normative reference values for left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction assessed by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in healthy subjects?
What are the normative reference values for left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction assessed by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in healthy subjects?
This meta-analysis establishes pooled normative reference values for left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography across age and sex groups.
Supplies pooled 3DE normative LV volumes and EF in healthy adults; leaves open standardization and outcome validation.
INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) as the reference technique to assess left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF). We performed a meta-analysis to identify normative reference values by real time 3DE in healthy subjects. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases using the key search terms three-dimensional echocardiography, volumes, and healthy. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, and source of variation was investigated using meta-regression. After selection, 13 articles were included (2806 subjects). Four studies were conducted in children and young adolescents; one study provided data in an independent pediatric subgroup. RESULTS: In adults, pooled mean value for LV EDV was 98.4 mL (95%CI, 87-110 mL), while LV ESV mean value was 37.0 mL (95%CI, 32-42 mL). LV EF mean value was 62.9% (95%CI 61.7-64.2%). Male subjects showed a significant increase in both LV EDV index (mean difference 5.3 mL/m(2) ; P < 0.001) and LV ESV index (mean difference 3.3 mL/m(2) ; P < 0.001). LV EF was significantly higher in female subjects (P = 0.003). In pediatric studies, LV EDV pooled mean value was 53.1 mL (95%CI, 38.1-68 mL), while for LV ESV, it was 19.8 mL (95%CI, 14.8-24.8 mL); LV EF mean value was 63.3% (95%CI, 61.6-65%). Significant heterogeneity and inconsistency were noted among studies. Age, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate were identified as a source of between-studies variation for LV volumes. Body surface area was a predictor of nonindexed LV volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Data from available studies of normative values for 3DE were summarized. Our findings may increase the generalizability of LV normative data by 3DE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buccheri et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: