Why the study?
Does the optimal hemodynamic effect of CRT depend on the interplay of electrical wavefronts or ventricular filling in dyssynchronous canine hearts?
Population
14 dogs with chronic left bundle-branch block (n=8) or atrioventricular (AV) block (n=6)
Comparison
Cardiac resynchronization therapy through… vs Different combinations of A-LV/A-RV pacing…
Design
Preclinical, 100 randomized combinations of A-LV/A-RV intervals
Authors
Loading...
Favors electrical fusion over filling for CRT hemodynamics in dyssynchrony; hypothesis-generating in canines and leaves open human translation.
Does the optimal hemodynamic effect of CRT depend on the interplay of electrical wavefronts or ventricular filling in dyssynchronous canine hearts?
In a canine model, the optimal hemodynamic benefit of CRT is driven by the fusion of pacing-induced and intrinsic electrical wavefronts leading to mechanical resynchronization, rather than by optimized ventricular filling.
Strik et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: