Why the study?
What baseline clinical factors predict the deterioration or normalization of impaired glucose tolerance over 5 years in middle-aged subjects?
What baseline clinical factors predict the deterioration or normalization of impaired glucose tolerance over 5 years in middle-aged subjects?
Baseline obesity and 2-hour glucose levels strongly predict the persistence of impaired glucose tolerance and the associated development of hypertension over 5 years.
Baseline BMI and 2-hour glucose may stratify IGT progression risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Twenty-five middle-aged subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were analysed 5 years later, showing normal glucose tolerance in 28% and persistent glucose deterioration in 72%. Body mass index (strongly) and 2-h glucose levels were clinically useful predictors, in the newly detected IGT-subjects, of persistent glucose deterioration (IGT or NIDDM) 5 years later. The frequency of hypertension was 36% in the newly-detected IGT subjects. Five years later this frequency increased to 54% in the persistently hyperglycaemic group, and decreased to none in the normalized group. Predictors of hypertension at the follow-up were baseline blood pressure and parts of the hyperinsulinaemic syndrome, such as serum triglyceride at baseline, BMI and 2-h glucose at the follow-up. Microalbuminuria (greater than 20 mg day-1) was not found at the 5-years follow-up, either if the subjects then had NIDDM, IGT or normal glucose tolerance. ECG abnormalities (ST segment and T wave changes) were two-fold more prevalent in the group with IGT or NIDDM than in the normalized group at the follow-up. Predictors were baseline BMI and incremental BMI. In conclusion, obesity and high 2-h glucose in newly-detected IGT-subjects seemed to predict the persistence of IGT 5 years later. Hypertension, but not microalbuminuria, was frequent when glucose deterioration persisted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cederholm et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: