Why the study?
Does 1-year exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve cost-effectiveness and reduce adverse cardiac events in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome?
Does 1-year exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve cost-effectiveness and reduce adverse cardiac events in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome?
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a dominant, cost-effective treatment option that significantly decreases the occurrence of adverse cardiac events in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome.
ECR may be dominant (lower costs, QALY gains) post-ACS; leaves open wider adoption pending confirmatory economic trials.
Health care decision-making requires evidence of the cost-effectiveness of medical therapies. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) implemented according to guidelines. All the patients (n = 204) had experienced a recent acute coronary syndrome and were randomized to a 1-year ECR (n = 109) or usual care (UC) group (n = 95). The patients' health-related quality of life was followed using the 15D instrument and health care costs were collected from electronic health registries. The cost-effectiveness of ECR was estimated based on intervention and health care costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The total average cost per patient was lower in ECR than in UC. The incremental cost was divided by the baseline-adjusted incremental QALYs (0.045), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -€24511/QALYs. A combined endpoint of mortality, recurrent coronary event, or hospitalization for a heart failure occurred for five patients in ECR and 16 patients in UC (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-10.6, P = 0.004, relative risk reduction 73%, number needed to treat eight). ECR is a dominant treatment option and decreases the occurrence of adverse cardiac events. These results are useful for decision-making when planning optimal utilization of resources in Finnish health care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hautala et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: