Why the study?
Does clopidogrel prevent recurrent ischaemic events in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke or transient ischaemic attacks?
Does clopidogrel prevent recurrent ischaemic events in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke or transient ischaemic attacks?
Clopidogrel is proposed as a sensible first-line secondary prevention therapy for all non-cardioembolic stroke subtypes and transient ischaemic attacks due to its efficacy and safety profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clopidogrel may be considered for non-cardioembolic stroke/TIA prevention; leaves open need for updated RCTs versus contemporary standards.
Antiplatelet therapy has proven efficacy in the secondary prevention of recurrent non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke. Recent evidence suggests clopidogrel is as effective as combined therapy with aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole for the prevention of recurrent stroke. As cerebrovascular and ischaemic heart disease are closely related, it would be sensible to use a drug shown to prevent vascular events in both territories. Clopidogrel meets these criteria, is superior to aspirin monotherapy, and has fewer side effects compared with extended-release dipyridamole. While there is no direct evidence supporting the use of clopidogrel in transient ischaemic attacks, it is likely that clopidogrel is effective because transient ischaemic attacks and stroke are part of the same disease spectrum. Clopidogrel could thus be useful as first line secondary prevention therapy in all non-cardioembolic stroke subtypes and transient ischaemic attacks, to prevent recurrent ischaemic events in all vascular territories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aw et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: