Key result
Clopidogrel was demonstrated to be noninferior to an aspirin/dipyridamole combination for the secondary prevention of ischemic strokes.
Why the study?
How should antiplatelet agents be utilized for secondary prevention of noncardiogenic stroke?
How should antiplatelet agents be utilized for secondary prevention of noncardiogenic stroke?
This review summarizes evidence supporting aspirin, aspirin/dipyridamole, and clopidogrel as effective options for secondary prevention of noncardiogenic stroke.
Supports multiple antiplatelet options for noncardiogenic stroke prevention; leaves open optimal agent selection by patient factors.
Antiplatelet therapy is a mainstay of secondary prevention of ischemic strokes. Recent studies, such as Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS), the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial, and the European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (ESPRIT), have added much to our understanding about how best to utilize the various antiplatelet agents available. Aspirin has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent strokes, and the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole has repeatedly been shown to outperform aspirin alone. Recently, clopidogrel was demonstrated to be "noninferior" to an aspirin/dipyridamole combination, and can be considered as a first-line agent. The American Stroke Association and American Heart Association have clear recommendations on how to utilize these agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simmons et al. (2010) conducted a review in Ischemic stroke. Antiplatelet agents was evaluated on Recurrent strokes. Clopidogrel was demonstrated to be noninferior to an aspirin/dipyridamole combination for the secondary prevention of ischemic strokes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: