Key result
Nirsevimab and clesrovimab hold considerable promise among monoclonal antibodies, while EDP-938 and AK0529 have reported promising phase 2 efficacy and safety data among antivirals for RSV.
Why the study?
Promising monoclonal antibody and antiviral therapies for RSV are progressing in clinical trials, but a systematic review on current progress was lacking.
Do RSV-specific monoclonal antibodies and antivirals demonstrate therapeutic efficacy and safety in humans?
Systematic Review (n=59)
Do RSV-specific monoclonal antibodies and antivirals demonstrate therapeutic efficacy and safety in humans?
Several RSV-specific monoclonal antibodies and antivirals, notably nirsevimab, clesrovimab, EDP-938, and AK0529, show promise in clinical trials for preventing and treating RSV infection.
May expand RSV prevention and treatment options; extends the monoclonal antibody and antiviral development pipeline.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute respiratory infection amongst all ages, causing a significant global health burden. Preventative and therapeutic options for RSV infection have long been under development, and recently, several widely-publicised vaccines targeting older adult and maternal populations have become available. Promising monoclonal antibody (mAb) and antiviral (AV) therapies are also progressing in clinical trials, with the prophylactic mAb nirsevimab recently approved for clinical use in infant populations. A systematic review on current progress in this area is lacking. We performed a systematic literature search (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, EudraCT, ANZCTR-searched Nov 29th, 2023) to identify studies on all RSV-specific mAbs and AV therapies that has undergone human clinical trials since year 2000. Data extraction focused on outcomes related to the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the intervention on trial, and all studies were graded against the OCEBM Levels of Evidence Table. Results from 59 studies were extracted, covering efficacy and safety data on six mAbs (motavizumab, motavizumab-YTE, nirsevimab, ALX-0171, suptavumab, clesrovimab) and 12 AV therapies (ALN-RSV01, RSV604, presatovir, MDT-637, lumicitabine, IFN-α1b, rilematovir, enzaplatovir, AK0529, sisunatovir, PC786, EDP-938). Of the mAbs reviewed, nirsevimab and clesrovimab hold considerable promise. The timeline for RSV-specific AV availability is less advanced, although EDP-938 and AK0529 have reported promising phase 2 efficacy and safety data. Moving forward, passive immunisation and treatment options for RSV infection will play a significant role in reducing the health burden of RSV, complementing recent advancements in vaccine development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD42022376633.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sevendal et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection (n=59). RSV-specific monoclonal antibodies and antivirals was evaluated on Therapeutic efficacy and safety. Nirsevimab and clesrovimab hold considerable promise among monoclonal antibodies, while EDP-938 and AK0529 have reported promising phase 2 efficacy and safety data among antivirals for RSV.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: