Why the study?
Do intracardiac electrodes detect early or subendocardial ischemia more sensitively than surface ECG in a canine model?
Do intracardiac electrodes detect early or subendocardial ischemia more sensitively than surface ECG in a canine model?
Intracardiac electrograms provide earlier and more sensitive detection of subendocardial ischemia compared to surface ECG in a canine model.
May support more sensitive ischemia detection via intracardiac leads in canines; hypothesis-generating, with human validation required before clinical consideration.
Subendocardial and early transmural ischemia may have significant clinical consequences while manifesting few ECG changes. Catheters were designed to be introduced transvenously into the right ventricle (RV), and coronary sinus (CS) and transarterially into the left ventricle (LV). The intracavitary electrodes were modified so that the electrodes would not contact the endocardium. In twenty-two dogs ninety-eight graded stenoses of the circumflex and left anterior descending coronary arteries were performed while electrograms (EGM) were recorded simultaneously from the intracardiac (IC) electrodes and surface ECG. Of those stenoses resulting in only nonspecific ECG changes, there were specific ischemic changes on 100% of LV, 60% of RV, and 89% of CS electrograms. Of those stenoses which resulted in no ECG change, there were specific ischemic changes in the 9/31 (29%) of LV, 3/31 (10%) of RV, and 6/31 (19%) of CS electrograms. Recognizable patterns of change occur on the intracardiac electrograms in response to both stenosis and reperfusion, earlier than any change on the ECG. Besides being more sensitive, intracardiac electrodes allowed for the detection of ischemia even in the presence of intraventricular conduction defects, strain patterns, and possibly other situations which might otherwise mask ischemic changes on the ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siegel et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: