Key result
Aspirin loading before PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction was associated with higher odds of coronary no-reflow (adjusted OR 4.49; 95% CI 1.56-12.92; p<0.001).
Why the study?
The association of aspirin loading with the risk of coronary no-reflow after PCI in patients with AMI had not been investigated.
Does aspirin loading before PCI increase the risk of coronary no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=3,100)
Does aspirin loading before PCI increase the risk of coronary no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Aspirin loading before PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction may be associated with an increased risk of coronary no-reflow, though these findings are hypothesis-generating.
Caution advised with pre-PCI aspirin loading in acute MI; observational association leaves open causality pending RCTs.
Background The association of aspirin loading with the risk of coronary no‐reflow (CNR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been investigated. We assessed the association of aspirin loading before PCI with CNR in patients with AMI. Materials and Methods This study included 3100 patients with AMI undergoing PCI. Of them, 2812 patients received aspirin loading (a single oral [or chewed] or intravenous dose of 150–300 mg) and 288 patients did not receive aspirin loading before PCI. The primary endpoint was CNR, defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction blood flow grade of <3 after the PCI. Results CNR occurred in 130 patients: 127 patients in the group with aspirin loading and 3 patients in the group without aspirin loading before PCI (4.5% vs. 1.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 4.50, 95% confidence interval, [1.42–14.21], p = 0.005). After adjustment, the association between aspirin loading and CNR was significant (adjusted OR = 4.49 [1.56–12.92]; p < 0.001). There was no aspirin loading‐by‐P2Y 12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) interaction ( p int = 0.465) or aspirin loading‐by‐chronic aspirin therapy on admission ( p int = 0.977) interaction with respect to the occurrence of CNR after PCI. Chronic low‐dose aspirin therapy on admission was not independently associated with higher risk of CNR after PCI (adjusted OR = 1.06 [0.65–1.72]; p = 0.824). Conclusion In patients with AMI undergoing PCI, aspirin loading before the PCI procedure at the guideline‐recommended doses was associated with higher odds of developing CNR. However, due to the limited number of events, the findings should be considered as hypothesis generating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ndrepepa et al. (2024) conducted an observational in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=3,100). Aspirin loading vs. No aspirin loading was evaluated on Coronary no-reflow (CNR), defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction blood flow grade of <3 after the PCI (adjusted OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.56-12.92, p=<0.001). Aspirin loading before PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction was associated with higher odds of coronary no-reflow (adjusted OR 4.49; 95% CI 1.56-12.92; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: