Key result
Pre-participation aerobic fitness did not significantly influence medium-term adherence to a supervised exercise program (mean P-VO2 75.9% in adherents vs 75.0% in non-adherents, p=0.83).
Why the study?
Does pre-participation physical fitness influence adherence to a supervised exercise program in adult participants?
Cohort (n=567)
Does pre-participation physical fitness influence adherence to a supervised exercise program in adult participants?
Baseline aerobic and non-aerobic physical fitness levels do not predict medium-term adherence to supervised exercise programs in cardiac rehabilitation.
Baseline fitness should not guide exercise program eligibility; this Level 4 finding leaves open other adherence determinants.
BACKGROUND: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation tends to reduce mortality. However, it requires medium/long-term adherence to regular physical exercise. It is relevant to identify the variables that affect adherence to an supervised exercise program (SEP). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of pre-participation levels of aerobic and non-aerobic physical fitness components in medium-term adherence to SEP. METHODS: A total of 567 SEP participants (65 ± 12 years) (68% men) were studied. Participants adherent to the program for less than 6 months (48%) (non-adherent - NAD) were compared with 52% of participants who were adherent for 6 months or more (adherents - AD). In the non-aerobic fitness, flexibility (FLX) (Flexitest) and muscle power (MPW)/body weight in standing rowing (watts/kg) were evaluated while aerobic fitness was obtained by direct measure of VO2max/body weight (VO2). These measurements were normatized for sex and age based on percentiles (P) (P-FLX/P-MPW) of reference data or percentages of predicted (P-VO2). Additionally, AD and NAD with extreme results (tertiles) were simultaneously compared for the three variables. RESULTS: There was no difference between AD and NAD for non-aerobic results, in median [P25-P75], P-FLX: 30 [13-56] and 31 [9-52], respectively, (p = 0.69) and P-MPW: 34 [17-58] and 36 [16-62], respectively (p = 0.96), and for aerobic results (mean ± standard error) P-VO2 (75.9 ± 1.3% and 75.0 ± 1.3%, respectively) (p = 0.83). When comparing extreme tertiles, a difference was found for P-MPW in the lower tertile only, with a slight advantage of AD over NAD- 9 [5-16] versus 4 [1-11] (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Although awareness of the pre-participation levels of aerobic and non-aerobic physical fitness components is useful for individualized exercise prescription, these variables do not seem to influence medium-term adherence to SEP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishijuka et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Cardiac rehabilitation / Supervised exercise program (n=567). Pre-participation aerobic and non-aerobic physical fitness was evaluated on Medium-term adherence (≥6 months) to a supervised exercise program (p=0.83). Pre-participation aerobic fitness did not significantly influence medium-term adherence to a supervised exercise program (mean P-VO2 75.9% in adherents vs 75.0% in non-adherents, p=0.83).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: