Key result
Intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic significantly reduced early postoperative pain at 24 hours compared to port site infiltration (VAS score 5.42 vs 7.21; P<0.01) in cholecystectomy.
Why the study?
To evaluate the role of port site versus intra-peritoneal infiltration of a local anaesthetic agent in reducing early postoperative pain following elective cholecystectomy.
Does intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic reduce early postoperative pain compared to port site infiltration in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy?
RCT (n=250)
randomized
No
Does intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic reduce early postoperative pain compared to port site infiltration in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.42% vs 7.21%
p-value: p=<0.01
Intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic provides better early postoperative analgesia than port site infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Supports intraperitoneal over port-site infiltration for post-cholecystectomy analgesia; confirms superiority in RCT.
Objective: To evaluate the role of port site and intra-peritoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic agent in reducing early postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.Setting And Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jun 2019 to Mar 2020. Methodology: This study was conducted on 250 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the studyperiod. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group-A received the port site infiltration of the local anaesthetic agent, while Group-B received the intraperitoneal infiltration of the same agent after the surgery. The pain at the surgical site was recorded on the visual analogue scale (VAS) 24 hours after the surgical procedure. Results: Out of 250 patients randomized into two groups, 130(52%) in Group-A and 120(48%) in Group-B. 160(64%) were male, while 90(36%) were female. The mean age of patients in our study was 40.15 ±6.57 years. The mean pain score in GroupA was 7.21±2.11, while in Group-B was 5.42±1.29. There was a significant difference in the pain score of both groups (p-value<0.01). Conclusion: Intraperitoneal infiltration of the local anaesthetic agent after the laparoscopic surgery emerged as better analgesia for early post-operative pain than port site infiltration of the same agent in the same dose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayaz et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in elective cholecystectomy (n=250). Intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic agent vs. Port site infiltration of local anaesthetic agent was evaluated on Pain at the surgical site on the visual analogue scale (VAS) 24 hours after the surgical procedure (p=<0.01). Intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic significantly reduced early postoperative pain at 24 hours compared to port site infiltration (VAS score 5.42 vs 7.21; P<0.01) in cholecystectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: