Key result
Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers showed no significant difference in intradialytic hypotension compared to other antihypertensives (RR 2.88; 95% CI 0.12-68.79).
Why the study?
Hypertension is highly prevalent among people with chronic kidney disease, and its treatment is particularly challenging in patients undergoing dialysis.
Do calcium channel blockers improve blood pressure or reduce intradialytic hypotension in patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis?
Systematic Review
Do calcium channel blockers improve blood pressure or reduce intradialytic hypotension in patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis?
Current evidence is insufficient to determine the benefits and harms of calcium channel blockers compared to other antihypertensives in patients with CKD on dialysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Imprecise estimates do not guide antihypertensive selection in dialysis; leaves open comparative intradialytic hypotension risk.
BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are used to manage hypertension which is highly prevalent among people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The treatment for hypertension is particularly challenging in people undergoing dialysis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of calcium channel blockers in patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies to 27 April 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared any type of CCB with other CCB, different doses of the same CCB, other antihypertensives, control or placebo were included. The minimum study duration was 12 weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS: = 0%, low certainty evidence) compared to other antihypertensives. There was no evidence of a difference in the occurrence of intradialytic hypotension (1 study, 92 participants: RR 2.88, 95% CI 0.12 to 68.79; very low certainty evidence) between dihydropyridine CCBs to other antihypertensives. Other side effects were not reported. Dihydropyridine CCB may make little or no difference to predialysis systolic (1 study, 40 participants: MD -4 mmHg, 95% CI -11.99 to 3.99; low certainty evidence) and diastolic blood pressure (1 study, 40 participants: MD -3.00 mmHg, 95% CI -7.06 to 1.06; low certainty evidence) compared to non-dihydropyridine CCB. There was no evidence of a difference in other side effects (1 study, 40 participants: RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.36; very low certainty evidence) between dihydropyridine CCB and non-dihydropyridine CCB. Intradialytic hypotension was not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of CCBs over other antihypertensives on predialysis blood pressure levels and intradialytic hypotension among people with CKD who required haemodialysis were uncertain. Effects of CCBs on other side effects and cardiovascular death also remain uncertain. Dihydropyridine CCBs may decrease predialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressure level compared to placebo or no treatment. No studies were identified in children or peritoneal dialysis. Available studies have not been designed to measure the effects on costs. The shortcomings of the studies were that they recruited very few participants, had few events, had very short follow-up periods, some outcomes were not reported, and the reporting of outcomes such as changes in blood pressure was not done uniformly across studies. Well-designed RCTs, conducted in both adults and children with CKD requiring both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, evaluating both dihydropyridine and non-dihydropyridine CCBs against other antihypertensives are required. Future research should be focused on outcomes relevant to patients (including death and cardiovascular disease), blood pressure changes, risk of side effects and healthcare costs to assist decision-making in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mugendi et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. Calcium channel blockers vs. other antihypertensives, control, or placebo was evaluated on intradialytic hypotension (RR 2.88, 95% CI 0.12-68.79). Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers showed no significant difference in intradialytic hypotension compared to other antihypertensives (RR 2.88; 95% CI 0.12-68.79).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: