Key result
This review summarizes the feedback mechanisms and crosstalk between L-type Ca2+ channels and the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and their alterations in heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy.
This review highlights the critical role of defective L-type Ca2+ channel and sarcoplasmic reticulum crosstalk in the pathophysiology of heart failure and cardiac remodeling.
No immediate clinical implications; leaves open targeted research on Ca2+ handling defects in heart failure.
In the cardiac dyad, sarcolemmal L-type Ca(2+) channels (LCCs) and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) release channels (RyR) are structurally in close proximity. This organization provides for an efficient functional coupling, tuning SR Ca(2+) release for optimal contraction of the myocyte. Given that LCC are regulated by the prevailing [Ca(2+)], this structural organization is the setting for feedback mechanisms and crosstalk. A defective coupling of Ca(2+) influx via LCC to activation of RyR has been implicated in reduced SR Ca(2+) release in heart failure. Both functional changes in LCC properties and structural re-organization of LCC in T-tubules could be involved. LCC are regulated by cytosolic Ca(2+), and crosstalk with SR Ca(2+) handling occurs on a long-term basis, i.e. during steady-state changes in heart rate, on an intermediate-term basis, i.e. on a beat-to-beat basis during sudden rate changes, and on a very short- or immediate-term basis, i.e. during a single heartbeat. We review the properties and consequences of these different feedback mechanisms and the changes in heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy that have thus far been studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bito et al. (2007) conducted a review in Heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy. Crosstalk between L-type Ca2+ channels and the sarcoplasmic reticulum was evaluated. This review summarizes the feedback mechanisms and crosstalk between L-type Ca2+ channels and the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and their alterations in heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: