Why the study?
Does hormone replacement therapy improve left ventricular diastolic functions in healthy postmenopausal women?
Does hormone replacement therapy improve left ventricular diastolic functions in healthy postmenopausal women?
Hormone replacement therapy for 6 months significantly improved echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular diastolic function in healthy postmenopausal women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observed diastolic improvements with HRT should not yet change practice; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials of healthy postmenopausal women.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of estrogen and estrogen plus progesterone replacement therapy on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function parameters in healthy postmenopausal women. METHODS: Forty-six healthy consecutive postmenopausal women were prospectively enrolled. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), which was either 0.625 mg/day conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) alone, or with 2.5 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) was administered depending on the hysterectomy status. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function parameters were evaluated with echocardiography before and after 6 months of HRT. The paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone did not significantly alter the left ventricular dimensions and systolic function parameters. However, significant improvements were noted in several diastolic function parameters including late diastolic mitral flow velocity, ratio of early to late mitral flow velocity and isovolumic relaxation time (P=0.003, P=0.001 and P=0.005, respectively, for the CEE group; all P<0.001 for the CEE+MPA group). CONCLUSIONS: Estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone replacement therapy may significantly improve left ventricular diastolic functions in healthy postmenopausal women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yı́ldı́rı́r et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: