Key result
Compared with the older 1921-1926 cohort, the 1946-1951 cohort had significantly higher odds of agreement between self-report and hospital data for hypertension (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.56-2.78; P<0.0001).
Population
Women born between 1946-1951 and 1921-1926 participating in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's…
Comparison
Self-report data vs Administrative hospital data records
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Higher agreement in recent cohorts supports self-report for hypertension in midlife women; leaves open generalizability to other conditions and populations.
Cohort
Odds Ratio: 2.08 (95% CI 1.56–2.78)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Self-report data is accurate for ascertaining diabetes but less accurate for heart disease and stroke, whereas hospital data underestimates hypertension in mid- and older-aged women.
Cristina et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and stroke. Self-report data vs. Administrative hospital data records was evaluated on Agreement between self-report and hospital data for hypertension (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.56-2.78, p=<0.0001). Compared with the older 1921-1926 cohort, the 1946-1951 cohort had significantly higher odds of agreement between self-report and hospital data for hypertension (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.56-2.78; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: