Key result
Pulse arrival time demonstrated only moderate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.57) when measured sequentially over a 1-month period in healthy adults.
Why the study?
Pulse arrival time is a feasible and cost-effective parameter to assess vascular stiffness, but few studies have evaluated its test-retest repeatability over time.
Observational (n=21)
No
Effect estimate: ICC 0.57 (95% CI 0.38, 0.76)
Pulse arrival time (PAT) measured via PPG and ECG showed only moderate test-retest repeatability over a 1-month period in healthy adults, suggesting the need for further validation before large-scale clinical application.
PAT repeatability via PPG-ECG supports feasibility research; leaves open clinical adoption for vascular ageing assessment.
Objectives: Vascular ageing is increasingly being recognised as a vital marker of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Assessment of vascular stiffness is an important parameter in this context. Pulse arrival time (PAT) assessed using photoplethysmography (PPG) and digital electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is a feasible and cost-effective parameter for this assessment. However, there are few, if any, studies that have assessed the test-retest repeatability of this parameter over time. Materials and Methods: We computed PAT using finger PPG and Lead II ECG and measured it sequentially at five instances over a period of 1 month in 21 healthy adults (10 males and 11 females). Mean and diastolic blood pressure (MBP and DBP) and heart rate (HR) were also measured at each visit. A novel parameter, PAT normalised for HR of 75 (PAT-75), was also computed. PAT and PAT-75 were compared for these visits using repeated measures analysis of variance. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the test-retest reliability of this parameter. Results: MBP, DBP, and PAT values did not show any difference between the visits. HR was significantly different between the visits. PAT-75 was significantly lower for the afternoon of day 1 as compared to the forenoon. ICC demonstrated only moderate reliability of PAT (ICC = 0.57), with further reduction observed for PAT-75 (ICC = 0.38). Conclusion: PAT was only moderately repeatable on repeated evaluation over a 1-month period. This finding may have implications for the large-scale applicability of this technology, and therefore, we propose further investigation into the repeatability of this parameter in large cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jose et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=21). Pulse arrival time (PAT) measurement was evaluated on Test-retest reliability of pulse arrival time (PAT) assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (ICC 0.57, 95% CI 0.38, 0.76). Pulse arrival time demonstrated only moderate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.57) when measured sequentially over a 1-month period in healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: