Key result
At least 4.5 consecutive days of twice-daily home blood pressure monitoring provided reliable agreement with a 7-day protocol for diagnosing hypertension (κ 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.94).
Why the study?
Current guidelines vary in recommendations on the protocol for HBPM, leaving unclear the number of measurement days needed to reliably estimate true home BP and hypertension status compared to a 7-day protocol.
Does a shorter home blood pressure monitoring protocol (3-4.5 days) provide a reliable estimate of true home BP and hypertension status compared to a 7-day protocol in adults?
Observational (n=567)
Does a shorter home blood pressure monitoring protocol (3-4.5 days) provide a reliable estimate of true home BP and hypertension status compared to a 7-day protocol in adults?
Effect estimate: κ 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.94)
p-value: p=<0.05
A 3-day protocol of twice-daily measurements provides a reliable estimate of home BP, but at least 4.5 days are needed for a reliable diagnosis of hypertension.
PURPOSE: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements are essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of hypertension. Current guidelines vary in their recommendations on the protocol for home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). We aimed to assess the number of blood pressure (BP) measurement days needed for a reliable estimation of true home BP (the expected BP level over time) and hypertension status, using the European guideline-based 7-day HBPM protocol as a reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 567 adults who performed a 7-day HBPM were analysed. Blood pressure was measured twice daily (morning and evening readings) using the Microlife Average Mode (MAM), which takes a weighted average of 3 consecutive BP readings. The variability of average BP for an increasing number of measurements was assessed using a linear mixed model including a random intercept per individual and correlated residuals. The reliability of home hypertension status was assessed by the κ statistic. RESULTS: <0.05). The average of 7 twice-daily MAM BP measurements was at most 5.2/3.3 mm Hg higher and 9.5/4.8 mm Hg lower than the true home BP for 95% of the individuals. Reducing this protocol to 3 days increased this variability by 1.5/1.0 mm Hg and 4.8/2.3 mm Hg, respectively. For diagnosing home hypertension, there was good agreement with a minimum of 4.5 days of HBPM (ĸ-statistic 0.88; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.82-0.94). CONCLUSION: Twice-daily MAM BP measurements for 3 consecutive days provide a reliable estimate of home BP. At least 4.5 consecutive days of HBPM are required for a reliable diagnosis of home hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groenland et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=567). Reduced duration home blood pressure monitoring (3 to 4.5 days) vs. 7-day HBPM protocol was evaluated on Reliability of home hypertension status diagnosis (κ 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94, p=<0.05). At least 4.5 consecutive days of twice-daily home blood pressure monitoring provided reliable agreement with a 7-day protocol for diagnosing hypertension (κ 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.94).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: