Key result
Brachial occlusion-cuff pulse wave analysis correlates strongly with Finapres during the Valsalva maneuver.
Why the study?
Continuous non-invasive beat-to-beat arterial waveform detection via finger cuffs has limitations due to distal blood pressure recording using volume-clamp methods.
Does a novel brachial occlusion-cuff principle accurately measure beat-to-beat pulse wave changes compared to Finapres during a Valsalva maneuver in healthy adults?
Observational (n=12)
Open-label
No
Does a novel brachial occlusion-cuff principle accurately measure beat-to-beat pulse wave changes compared to Finapres during a Valsalva maneuver in healthy adults?
A novel brachial occlusion-cuff monitor shows strong positive correlation with Finapres for beat-to-beat pulse wave analysis during a Valsalva maneuver, suggesting feasibility for non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring.
Supports feasibility of cuff-based monitoring in healthy adults; leaves open validation in patients before clinical use.
Czech physiologist Penaz tried to overcome limitations of invasive pulse-contour methods (PCM) in clinical applications by a non-invasive method (finger mounted BP cuff) for continuous arterial waveform detection and beat-to-beat analysis. This discovery resulted in significant interest in human physiology and non-invasive examination of hemodynamic parameters, however has limitations because of the distal BP recording using a volume-clamp method. Thus, we propose a validation of beat-to-beat signal analysis acquired by novel a brachial occlusion-cuff (suprasystolic) principle and signal obtained from Finapres during a forced expiratory effort against an obstructed airway (Valsalva maneuver). Twelve healthy adult subjects [2 females, age = (27.2 ± 5.1) years] were in the upright siting position, breathe through the mouthpiece (simultaneously acquisition by brachial blood pressure monitor and Finapres) and at a defined time were asked to generate positive mouth pressure for 20 s (Valsalva). For the purpose of signal analysis, we proposed parameter a “Occlusion Cuff Index” (OCCI). The assumption about similarities between measured signals (suprasystolic brachial pulse waves amplitudes and Finapres’s MAP) were proved by averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r- = 0.60, p < 0.001). The averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the comparative analysis of OCCI between methods was r- = 0.88, p < 0.001. The average percent change of OCCI during maneuver: 8% increase, 19% decrease and percent change of max/min ratio is 35%. The investigation of brachial pulse waves measured by novel brachial blood pressure monitor shows positive correlation with Finapres and the parameter OCCI shows promise as an index, which could describe changes during beat-to-beat cardiac cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matera et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Healthy adults undergoing Valsalva maneuver for hemodynamic pulse wave analysis (n=12). Brachial occlusion-cuff (suprasystolic) technique vs. Finapres (finger volume-clamp method) was evaluated on Correlation of Occlusion Cuff Index (OCCI) and pulse wave amplitudes between suprasystolic brachial occlusion technique and Finapres during Valsalva maneuver (r = 0.88 for OCCI; r = 0.60 for pulse wave amplitude vs MAP, p=<0.001). Suprasystolic brachial occlusion-cuff pulse wave analysis correlated strongly with Finapres during the Valsalva maneuver for the Occlusion Cuff Index (r = 0.88, p < 0.001) and MAP (r = 0.60, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: